The default and only setting here is all cylinders. The indignation is both righteous and rejuvenating. Please never stop. This is how dedicated audiences are built.
Well put. “Daily wire right” was a big umbrella term i used and you struck to the heart of it, the issue is the underlying ‘why’ and drive behind this strain of conservatism.
The guy youre responding to harped on a single point (well the first sentence in this which shows how far he went) to try and obfuscate and deflect by by overanalyzing an imagined contradiction. He truly is a disciple of Ben Shapiro.
> The guy youre responding to harped on a single point
Because that was a decent representation of the problem with your article.
Half you complaints against the "Daily Wire Right" are about things they never supported but instead things you brought with you from the 1990s left and projected onto them. Most of the other half of your complaints are about them not adopting the old 1990s leftist beliefs that you still hold.
> So I checked hers. A philosophical approach that relies on a literal free energy machine, no children, or obligation beyond ones desires is a contray to nature and fundamentally incoherent.
The default and only setting here is all cylinders. The indignation is both righteous and rejuvenating. Please never stop. This is how dedicated audiences are built.
This is reassuring, I appreciate it
Quite a read.
We're all in the wilderness now.
Let er rip!
Totally nails it, well written!
> I wanted the gay weed farmers to have AR-15’s
When did the Daily Wire ever support gay weed farmers? I must have missed that article.
Your complaint isn't with the Daily Wire. It's with yourself from 10 years ago.
Well put. “Daily wire right” was a big umbrella term i used and you struck to the heart of it, the issue is the underlying ‘why’ and drive behind this strain of conservatism.
The guy youre responding to harped on a single point (well the first sentence in this which shows how far he went) to try and obfuscate and deflect by by overanalyzing an imagined contradiction. He truly is a disciple of Ben Shapiro.
> The guy youre responding to harped on a single point
Because that was a decent representation of the problem with your article.
Half you complaints against the "Daily Wire Right" are about things they never supported but instead things you brought with you from the 1990s left and projected onto them. Most of the other half of your complaints are about them not adopting the old 1990s leftist beliefs that you still hold.
> So I checked hers. A philosophical approach that relies on a literal free energy machine, no children, or obligation beyond ones desires is a contray to nature and fundamentally incoherent.
Did the Daily Wire ever claim otherwise?
> Our economy would literally collapse tomorrow if we adopted the values of our founders, like "thrift."
Keynesian propaganda.
Also isn't one of the standard complaints of people like you that "you're not as (materially) well of as your parents"?